Some stories never fade from memory, especially when they involve a moment that shocked the nation. The attempted assassination of Donald Trump during a 2024 rally is one of them, and new concerns about the FBI’s handling of the case are now coming to light. Lawmakers say important details may have been withheld.

Rep. Pat Fallon, who led the congressional task force reviewing the attack, says the group did not receive key information about gunman Thomas Crooks. Although the FBI initially claimed little was known about Crooks, Fallon says that doesn’t match what investigators now admit. He believes the task force was “stonewalled” during the review.

The turning point came when it was revealed that Crooks had posted more than 700 online comments, many containing extremist views. Fallon says this information was never provided to his team. He is now pushing to recall former FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate for further questioning.

The attack left a lasting scar. A local firefighter, Corey Comperatore, was killed while protecting his family, and two others were wounded. Crooks’ motive remains unclear, which has fueled public frustration and strengthened calls for more transparency.

Political commentator Tucker Carlson also questioned why Crooks’ online activity wasn’t disclosed sooner. Meanwhile, FBI officials insist they conducted an extensive investigation, reviewing thousands of files and digital records.

The FBI told us Thomas Crooks tried to kill Donald Trump last summer but somehow had no online footprint. The FBI lied, and we can prove it because we have his posts. The question is why? Story tomorrow.

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 13, 2025

Former FBI agent Jody Weis says Crooks should have been flagged based on his digital footprint. He believes a deeper review might have led investigators to intervene earlier.

The renewed scrutiny shows how vital truth and transparency are after such a painful national moment.