Some stories spark concern because they touch on fear, trust, and national security. That happened again when questions were raised about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. The debate grew louder after Tucker Carlson challenged the FBI’s account of the suspect, Thomas Crooks.
Crooks was accused of firing at Trump during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania last July. The attack wounded the former president and claimed the life of firefighter Corey Comperatore. Two other men were also injured before Crooks was fatally shot by a Secret Service sniper.
The turning point came when Carlson claimed the FBI had lied about Crooks’ online activity. He said new footage and digital files showed Crooks practicing with a gun and posting comments online. Carlson argued this proved the suspect was not a “mysterious lone wolf” as some believed.
The FBI responded quickly, stating they never claimed Crooks had “no online footprint.” Director Kash Patel later released documents outlining the scale of the investigation. According to the bureau, more than 480 employees reviewed accounts, devices, financial records, interviews, and public tips.
Who is Thomas Crooks? pic.twitter.com/WwjvPGGRwS
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 14, 2025
Their findings concluded that Crooks acted alone and did not share his plans with anyone. They also said his online presence was limited, not erased or hidden. This official summary directly pushed back against Carlson’s accusations.
The debate continues, but one thing is clear: moments like these remind us how fragile trust can feel during tense times. And they encourage us to look for steady ground when emotions rise.